|
Scholar Sheds New Light
on Death of Danish
Crown Prince Hamlet
|

|
The legend of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, (had he
lived he would have become Denmark's King Hamlet II) always held
that Hamlet was killed during a grudge-duel with courtier Laertes
(son of Curmudgeon Laureate, Pelonius and brother of Hamlet's dumped
girlfriend, Ophelia). This belief is upheld in coroner's records
from the time which list mountebank unction poisoning as the cause
of death. Presumably this unction was introduced through a scratch
from Laertes' anointed foil. Years after the incident, this theory
was further substantiated by entries concerning the mountebank found
in Laertes' diary.
Another person with a stake in this version of events was the Norwegian
Prince Strongarm, known more widely by his nomen linguae francae,
Fortinbras. Soon after Hamlet's alleged death, Prince Fortinbras
became King Fortinbras (Fort. II of Norway & Fort. I of Denmark).
Few people in Scandinavia were in a position to dispute Fortinbras'
accounts of what happened. Today, however, a group called Gnostic
Shakespeare asserted that all this is largely false. A lecture on
the subject was given at a colloquium on Medieval Fringe Studies
at the University of Chicago. The speaker was (Gnostic leader
Gregory Seagle, Dean of the University of Chicago and known nationally
for his exposure of the Abraham Lincoln-3M Post-lt note scandal.
|
|
"Prince Hamlet was known to have suffered from
a noisome chronic monohumourous disease" began Seagle, "characterized
by severe bilial melanosis exacerbated by a congenital lack of other
humours. This left the prince open to attacks of hypermetropic monochromatic
chyme, which, if severe enough, can cause fainting spells."
Seagle went on to elaborate other facets of the disease including
irritability, torpor, and the inability to answer a simple question.
Having thus prepared the audience, Seagle loosed his bombshell:
"After years of puzzling over the nearly indecipherable code
of Horatio's journals, we now know roughly how to translate this
fascinating passage: 'Odaytay I illedkay amlethay. Ouldcay otnay
earbay ishay oddamnedgay oodingbray and artsmay outhmay one oremay
inutemay', which roughly means that Horatio killed Prince Hamlet,
being at wit's end both with Hamlet's rumination and his flippancy."
|

|
|
The crowd gasped and began murmuring (like
in the Bible), but Seagle overrode them shouting: "Wait, there's
more!" The crowd immediately quieted down (like at the beginning
of Marc Antony's speech in Julius Caesar), "In another passage,
written just after the play within a play, Horatio claims: 'Iniallyfay
otgay in Aerteslay isterssay ickersknay. Eshay asway ulytray onesthay
and airfay and a illfulskay and ovinglay umphay' which means, again
roughly, that he had a tryst with Ophelia sometime before she died.
This perhaps adds jealousy to frustration, rage and impatience to
Horatio's list of motives for killing Hamlet.
The crowd gasped and murmured again and Seagle
did nothing to stop them this time. A charter member of Gnostic
Shakespeare; Sir Isaac Newton (on sabbatical leave from his Westminster
Abbey vault) , leapt to his feet for a question (a mistake) . "How
do you reconcile these journal entries with the traditional accounts
of the prince's death?" inquired Newton just before he tumbled
to the floor because, sadly, one of his legs had fallen off.
|
|

|
Seagle patiently held on to his answer until
sympathetic fellow audience members reassembled Newton
and returned him to his chair. "Because we know ..." Seagle
began but stopped in mid-sentence. Pointing in Newton's direction,
Seagle shouted "His ear. Get his ear!" Apparently, during
his fall, Newton had also detached his right ear, but this was overlooked
owing to the much more spectacular loss of limb. Finding the ear
on the lap of a nearby common, low, fat barge
woman (on leave from Wind in the Willows)
another audience member stapled the ear back on to Newton's head
in approximately the same spot as it had been in before.
Again in reminiscence of Julius Caesar, Seagle quipped "I would
remind Dr. Newton that I am not making Marc Antony's eulogy here
and that the good Doctor may keep his ears to himself." The
crowd hooted, howled and made raspberry noises, pointing derisively
at Newton, who was clearly embarrassed but wholly unable to blush.
|
|
"Because we know" continued Seagle, "from
his medical records that Hamlet was subject to fainting spells. Further,
we know from Laertes' diary that the mountebank's name was R. Westheimer
and this suggests that the unction likely wasn't poison at all, but rather
a relatively ineffective aphrodisiac favored by short know-it-all Germans.
We therefore believe that Hamlet merely swooned during his duel with Laertes,
either from gross melancholic indigestion or from general ennui.
"Do you think it possible," asked Newton in follow-up (this time
prudently remaining in his seat) "journal entries aside, that Horatio
himself was actually capable of killing the prince?"
"Little question of that" Seagle answered. "We know that
Horatio had a very short fuse and tended to act first and ask questions
later. You'll remember that Horatio swung his battle-ax at the first appearance
of Hamlet's father's ghost. Now, that was pretty silly. Have you ever heard
tell of an apparition being hacked to death? I mean, what the hell was Horatio
thinking, anyway?"
"We postulate that Hamlet's final hours went something like this: Hamlet
swoons and faints during the duel and is taken for dead. Fortinbras bids
his soldiers shoot in Hamlet's honor so as not to appear too precipitous
himself at grabbing the Danish crown. The gun report wakens Hamlet, but
he's too dazed to stir until after Fortinbras runs off to get himself coronated,
the crowd following. Hamlet and Horatio are left alone. Hamlet sits up.
Horatio, a close friend of Hamlet's, is elated by this miraculous escape
from death. He warns Hamlet of Fortinbras' impending usurpation. Hamlet
couldn't give a shit. He eschews the crown and blithely asks Horatio along
for the accustomed walk through the graveyard. Puzzled, Horatio goes along
with Hamlet. Once in the graveyard Hamlet ignores all of Horatio's questions
and pleadings and begins to soliloquize. Horatio, already stunned and intensely
annoyed, is simply overcome by his own choleric disposition and kills Hamlet
in a rage. He gets away with it as Hamlet was presumed dead anyway."
The crowd gasped in disbelief, then began applauding and
throwing petunias, lupines and coxcombs at Seagle. As he left the stage
glowing with self-satisfaction, he was hit in the face with a cosmic
pie. Seagle refused comment to the press, citing
his upcoming book, and offered to send it to them for $29.95 plus shipping,
handling, and state sales tax. |